Peter Mafany Musonge

Can Musongue’s committee unite the country?

The Africa Report | Created with great pomp in 2017 and presented as a solution to the socio-political crisis shaking Cameroon, the ‘Commission pour la Promotion du Bilinguisme et du Multiculturalisme’ [Committee for the Promotion of Bilingualism and Multiculturalism] is struggling to bring a deeply divided country together.

Peter Mafany Musongue slowly made his way to the Yaounde Convention Centre. On 21 January, the former prime minister of Cameroon attended a meeting there along with the other 14 members of the Commission pour la promotion du bilinguisme et du multiculturalisme [National Committee for the Promotion of Bilingualism and Multiculturalism] (CNPBM), an institution he has headed since its creation in 2017.

As he settled into meeting room “A”, where the biannual session took place, Musongue was aware that his citizens have a long list of demands. Especially since, for the year 2021 alone, its budget amounts to about 3bn CFA francs (€4.5m) – a substantial budget in a context of crisis, in which resources are scarce. The adoption of this package is, moreover, the main item on the agenda.

“This budget will allow us to carry out our three main programmes,” said Musongue in a brief statement to the media at the end of the session. “The programme on bilingualism, which is to be extended and implemented throughout the country, the programme on multiculturalism and living together and, finally, the one on governance and institutional support.”

“No effects on the ground”

A plan of action that should give a boost to activities in the field and silence criticism. There are indeed prominent public voices denouncing the organisation’s wait-and-see approach, given the fact that the social climate is deteriorating as the days go by. The events that occurred during the 2018 presidential election were a continuation of the problems that have affected the country since the Anglophone crisis began in 2016.

Musongue himself acknowledges a resurgence of “intra-community stigmatisation.” “In the political field, frightening expressions such as ‘supremacists’ or ‘ethno-fascists’ are used to label certain individuals or groups […] On the economic front, odious rhetoric is directed against certain tribes that are depicted as ‘land thieves’ and ‘invaders.’ This worrying phenomenon can lead to uncontrollable acts of violence,” he said in a forum at the end of 2020.

Presented three years ago as the solution to these divisions, the CNPBM is struggling to break a cycle that has plunged the country into a climate of anxiety and where violence is ongoing. “We don’t feel the effects of this committee on the ground,” says Peter O., a resident of Yaoundé. “Since its members were installed, hate speech between communities has increased. Even the Anglophone crisis, which was at the origin of its creation, is still ongoing.”

Check Also

IMF approves $689.5 mln for Cameroon to help with COVID-19 impact

DAKAR — Reuters The International Monetary Fund (IMF) said on Thursday its board had approved …

5 comments

  1. **** THE SO-CALLED COMMISSION ON BILINGUALISM ****

    The Anglophone Question is NOT a linguistic problem. It is a conflict between two peoples and two nations.
    An UN-envisioned federal union code-named, FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF CAMEROON, made up of two states of equal status, i.e. SC, and LRC, as defined in UNGA Resolution 1608 of April 21, 1961, was NEVER implemented.
    This failure by the UN to respect and ensure the implementation of Art. 102 of UN Charter to safeguard the interest of the partners in the union facilitated the annexation of the weaker partner, Southern Cameroons, by la Republique du Cameroun.

    • The above-mentioned facts about the Anglophone Question are laid bare for all to read and properly digest. These facts so presented are no longer subject to easy manipulation, poor interpretation, and misinformation by whomever and for whatever reason.
      The so-called commission on bilingualism is an example of the manipulation of the Anglophone Question by Dictator Biya. He is attempting to redefine the Anglophone Question as a linguistic problem.
      That is the reason this commission is considered as a NON-ENTITY by Southern Cameroonians.
      The truth always prevails. The answer to the question “Can Musongue’s committee unite the country?” is a fat N-I-E-T. This entity is another WHITE-ELEPHANT project.

      IT IS EASY TO START A WAR. HOWEVER, IT IS EXTREMELY DIFFICULT TO STOP A WAR

  2. Lazy Bakweri man, your committee will die soon, when Biya exits.

    • This one too can’t tag it on Bamenda pipo can you? Dull stupid thing. The thought of eventually sharing Ambaland with some you tribalisticic Sako following thieves give me nightmare.

  3. The government is wrong, the cardinal is wrong, the fons are wrong. anglophone politicians like Fru Ndi are wrong. AMBA weti wona want noh. so na only AMBA correct? hahahaha comedy revolution.