Colonial art: The case of a piece stolen from Cameroon

Deutsche Welle | The Tangue is a traditional sculpture that’s known to have been looted from Cameroon under German colonial rule. But 136 years later, it’s still in Munich.

Protest posters against the Berlin Humboldt Forum museum hang on the walls of the conference room of the AfricAvenir Foundation in Douala, Cameroon’s largest city. A fan rattles from the ceiling while a fluorescent bulb throws its bright light onto a replica of a sculpture known as the “Tangue.”

The sculpture serves as a memorial for the fact that the original ship’s beak, an artfully carved wooden piece that once adorned the tip of the 19th-century royal vessel, was stolen.

The Tangue is a ritual object that connects the people of the coastal city with the spiritual forces of the river. It has, however, been in Germany for more than 130 years, in Munich’s Museum Fünf Kontinente (Five Continents Museum).

For the founder of the AfricAvenir Foundation, Prince Kum’a Ndumbe III, this is a painful loss for his culture to this day. The historian and German studies scholar worked for a long time as a professor at the Free University of Berlin. “Everything that had a deep spiritual meaning for Africans has been taken away in order to teach (them) other religions,” he says. “But you can’t steal the souls of whole peoples, and then claim to bring them civilization!”

The Foundation AfricAvenir in Douala has a replica of the Tangue

A clear case of colonial looted art

When Cameroon was about to become a German colony at the end of the 19th century, the Tangue was still owned by Lock Priso, the head of the royal Bele Bele family, rulers of a district of Douala. In order to secure exclusive trade advantages, the Germans convinced the kings of the flourishing coastal city of Douala to sign a protection treaty. Only one person refused to sign it: Lock Priso, the grandfather of the foundation’s founder, Kum’a Ndumbe.

The German attack on Hickorytown, Lock Priso’s village, in 1884

In December 1884, German warships entered Douala and Lock Priso’s resistance was violently broken. He then had to sign a peace treaty with the Germans. When the colonial troops attacked his village, German consul Max Buchner secured the Tangue from the chief’s house before it was set on fire.

The case is clear: The ship’s beak was looted as spoils of war. A year later, Buchner donated his loot to the Royal Ethnographic Collection in Munich, today’s Five Continents Museum.

Why the piece is still in Germany
In the 1990s, historian Kum’a Ndumbe rediscovered the ship’s beak there and reclaimed it. But years later, the piece is still part of the Munich museum’s collection.

For Uta Werlich, director of the Five Continents Museum, the problem lies in the fact that “it has not been determined with sufficient proof that Kum’a Ndumbe III is the legitimate heir of Lock Priso and whether the Tangue can be returned to him in the name of the Bele Bele family.”

The Tangue in the Five Continents Museum in Munich with museum director Uta Werlich

Power relations in Douala make it difficult for German authorities to answer this question definitely: Kum’a Ndumbe, as Lock Priso’s grandson and part of the influential and socially recognized royal Bele Bele family in Cameroon, sees himself as his legal successor. However, the official head of the Bele Bele family, appointed by the state of Cameroon, is Paul Mbappe. He has barely shown interest in the Tangue so far.

“It’s a complex situation, and it needs to be clarified before we return the Tangue too quickly,” explains Stefan Eisenhofer, curator of the Africa department at the Munich Museum.

Who decides who is the rightful heir?
Which family member has the right to take back looted art? Kum’a Ndumbe, who has established a strong network with German NGOs dealing with colonialism, or the official Bele Bele family representative Paul Mbappe? Kum’a Ndumbe claims that Mbappe was selected by the state precisely because he takes a less critical stance on the issue of restitution and does not offer any resistance. But who can and is allowed to take a final decision on this question?

Prince Kum’a Ndumbe III is reclaiming the sculpture that belonged to his grandfather

One can also ask: Are these complex power relations in Cameroon possibly being used as an excuse to postpone the return of the looted ship’s beak?

Guidelines for German museums — without legal obligations
Ethnological museums in Germany are filled with art and cultural assets that were collected during the colonial era. The German Empire had colonies from the 1880s until after the First World War, which ended in 1918. It is estimated that around 1.5 million colonial objects are stored in the depots of German museums. They were exchanged, bought, given — and stolen. It is unclear how many of the exhibits are tainted by conflict and violence.

It is a known fact that the theft of cultural goods in Africa was a common practice for colonial rulers. For some time now, calls for restitution to the societies of origin have been growing louder. Politicians are sensitized: with the support of the German Minister of State for Culture Monika Grütters, the German Museum Association published a guide on how to deal with collections from a colonial context in 2019. However, it is not legally binding.

In February 2019, the German state of Baden-Württemberg made a first move by returning the stolen Bible and the cattle whip of the Nama leader Hendrik Witbooi to Namibia. Witbooi, who lived from 1830 to 1905, fought against the German colonial troops.

That restitution is a start — but compared to the multitude of other art and cultural assets, a purely symbolic act. When it comes to more valuable objects that are sometimes traded for millions on the art market, such as the famous Benin bronzes from present-day Nigeria, hardly anything is moving on the European side.

As for Prince Kum’a Ndumbe III, he is not giving up his restitution claims for the Tangue. In 2019, he published a book in which he compiled documents to support his entitlement to Lock Priso’s legacy. “I’m waiting,” explains the historian. “I did my thing. They wanted documents; I’ve sent them documents, and made them public.”

The long overdue debate about looted art and Europe’s colonial legacy is slowly reaching wider circles.

Check Also

Vincent Aboubakar : Officiel ! le Camerounais signe au Besiktas

Africa Top Sports | Annoncé depuis quelques jours, le transfert de Vincent Aboubakar au Besiktas …

6 comments

  1. Let us not be deceived here, it is irrational to think that simple protest is enough to force our opponents to return what they looted from us. Without an economy superior to that of Germany, we posses no instrument of power that will enable us to force Germany to bend to our will.but if we build an 8 trillion economy and announce the construction of a massive economic corridor from say widikum to kumasi.we can pose the return of our arts objects as a precondition for German companies to participate in the project.then and only then shall our opponents start thinking.

  2. Any artwork over. 70 years old in Italy can be considered of national interest and a order slapped on it ,to not be removed from the country .france has artists rights fee on goods going to decedents when items are sold sometimes .If it’s overly obvious the cultural context ( for Cameroonians ) of a said piece in a forigen museum is way higher than educational value at the museum for that forigen population ( the Germans ) ,then the museum has a complete obligation to permanently give it on loan or give ownership to the national museum of Cameroon ( which then has an obligation to display it in an accessible place to the deprived majority of the original area where it was sacred ) .

  3. Further on in the context of the piece the Cameroon museum has an obligation to give a large percentage of profits of future international tours ( African artt is a big influencer ) of it back to its original royal court so the continuation of commissions of spectacular African art may continue to influence western artis like Picasso ,and others. The German and Eu governments Are not exactly dishing out cultural visas for people to access their African cultural heritage in therir basement storage so they should stop fiddling around pretending its not there and place it with the rightful cultural heritage owners .tax payers in Germany will be happy to give back.

  4. If the tropical anglo-shacksons had it their way, they would give away all our treasures to the queen in bfuckingham palace..kikikikikikiki

    may the ancestors rid our land of the tropical anglo-shacksons and their equatorial gaullist cousins so that piece of Africa can prosper.

  5. What has befallen the art works, that the daugther of Pa S. T Muna – Ama TuTu Muna, as
    then minister of culture in LRC, carted away to Yaounde? I would have written more on this,
    but let`s get this answer first, please.

sit suscipit leo neque. felis vulputate,